The most important and honorable job a person can have is being a parent. It is very difficult, stressful, and bears a lot of responsibility. That is not to say that parents should do whatever they wish to their children. Everything effects the child mental and physical health and directly related to the parent’s action or inaction.
Children subconsciously learn and adapt better to their parents than anyone else. The difficulty lies in the choices children make based on the information handed them and honestly, the only ones that should have the patience would be the birth parents or adoptive parents that are saints.
Most parents expect everyone to stay out of their handling of their children. I agree up to a certain point, where the threshold for abusive behavior is breached. That line which is crossed is subjective and relative to the society’s culture and overall relationship between parent and child. I’m not concern with the “maybe it negatively will effect the child or not,” because my concern is with the actions that will absolutely have an negative impact.
Topics like whether or not a child should be spanked have no relevance. Some children must be spanked to unlearn certain behavior, while others it would be acceptable to “teach” the child by talking or other non-physical discipline. Children are not textbook examples, where you can look up the action to take. You can say that just as children will automatically learn from their parents, parents must manually learn the correct action to take to teach their children the “right” behavior.
Parental behavior such as cooking meth, beating of children for no specific reason, and other abusive or destructive behavior that most sane people would frown upon is what I’m referring to. Actions that society as a whole would point and shout, “You must not do that!” My complaint is that with the current United States system, nothing is done to keep the out casted parents from breeding. If you have to take children away in the first place, then the natural next step should be to get to the root of the problem and keep the person from having any more kids.
It is a more humane method and sensible than my other suggestions:
- Be shot in the lung. Why the lung? It is a most long and painful death as the blood fills up the lung and the person suffocates.
- If someone who rapes a child, should have a hot iron shoved up their ass and raped with it.
- Take a chainsaw and cut off their arm, then beat the person to an inch of their life with their limbs.
Meth Parents
Why are these people even allows to have kids? If you are picked up for drugs in your system, they should just spay or neuter the person to make for certain that they never have kids.
The question of whether they eventually turn their ways and turn to god or good, should they still be given the chance to have kids? That is a good question and I still think they shouldn’t be able to have kids. The idea that once a meth user, always a meth user stands. You have no crystal ball to see if they will turn back to meth using, so it would be easier to just be sure that they can’t ever have kids.
In my area, meth usage is a major, along with drinking. With as many bars as Springfield, Missouri has, you would think people would have 0.10 blood alcohol content at all times.
You hear a lot about parents with three or more kids who either died from toxic air or exposion from the toxics, or were taken away when the parents were jailed for five or more years. You have to wonder how they will be affected from their parents usage and manufacturing of the drug.
If they had been ‘fixed’ when they were first picked up, then at least a few parents would never had been. I would be much happier knowing that those kids would never grow up to be users themselves and screw their children up, than knowing that some of those children will grow up to be users themselves and have children.
It is sad, if you think about it with any comprehension of the thought of the children’s future. I would rather those potential kids never exist as horrible as it sounds.
“Redneck” Loving
I think dropping a child every 10 to 11 months is an unwise decision. Not that there is anything wrong with having sex all of the time and totalling 10+ kids in the birthing age, as long as you can feed the mouths.
I heard about a family who had five kids almost exactly one year apart taken away, because a lack of parental guidance, supervision, and care. I’m all for sex and having it, even if I’m still a virgin, I can’t expect others take similiar preventive action as me. I think that if you are going to have sex, you should use a condom or birth control just to keep the unwanted children population down.
If you aren’t going to care for your kids, the best option would be to either not have them or give them to someone who will halfway care for them. It is better to be with someone who halfway cares than a parent who doesn’t care at all.
As an aside, even after the kids were taken away the bitch was still popping kids out. Now if only I can find a whore like that to mate with, I’ll be living large.
Raping Kids
The question isn’t whether they should get 20 years in prison. The question is whether or not they should still live. I say no. If you start killing those who take the innocence of children, you would probably not stop people from raping kids, but it should be fun torturing them and broadcasting it to the public.
The prison population, is said to take care of those who molest or rape kids, however I say you take it further by publicity torturing them. It would keep the common would be rapist out of the game, “Hmm, be filmed while I’m beat within the inch of my life, or not rape any kids.” I’ll go with latter.
Actually, I base a lot of my decisions on the possiblity of prison anal raping, “If I do that, would I be ass raped if I am caught.” If the answer is yes, then you better bet your ass that I’m not going to do it. It keeps common folk from doing stuff they would do otherwise. For example, finding and killing bitches who rape kids, and oh, after you raped the child molester or child abuser. The irony would probably escape them, so it best to take a metal bat to their head.
I think the excuse that they can’t find a date because they live with their mom and hasn’t be laid ever is pretty damn lame. Hell, I could go out and find a lady to have sex with. It would take a few drinks, but it is possible. I hold firm that if some ugly pig face guy can date a ultra fine woman, then I can score an average lady easily.
A Parent’s Life Is For Their Kids
I sincerely believe that once you have a child, for the next 17 to 18 years, your life is now towards the child’s future. It is difficult, but the child for the first 7 to 13 years is entirely dependent on you for survival. They eventually move away from the dependency afterwards, which would bring thoughts of taking the kids out (read murder). Those who don’t should be rewarded, but there isn’t enough money in the world to do that. Their reward is in the hearts and minds of the children the bring into the world, continuing the family line.
I just hope that I can give to my future child or children the respect, care, and protection they require.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Media Matters: A Watch Group For Conservatives
- Climate Change – How it is a Win / Win
- Net Neutrality: Are People Wrong?
- Will Democrats Save Us from Corruption?
- Social Security
Oh my God!!! Man you really hit the nail on the head. You’re awesome…..a mom in GA
If you are picked up for drugs in your system, they should just spay or neuter the person to make for certain that they never have kids.
Because as we know people never, ever change.
I think you should be neutered for lack of compassion.
I think you are messing the point of this satire Brandon. I don’t want to see any more children die because of their idiot parents who choose to make meth instead of care for their kids. Many meth horror stories come to mind that deeply sadden me.
One recently was about a father who drunk on drugs killed both himself and his little boy. Not that neutering him would had helped, but I don’t think he should of had the right to had his kid with him. The point I’m making is that if a parent can not be responsible, then they shouldn’t have kids.
I wouldn’t take that chance, because most of them aren’t going to change. Sure a small percentage will, but what about the rest who place their children on the path of really screwed up life.
Do you think their children are going to say, “You know what, I think I’m not going to follow my parents and I’m not going to take meth or drugs.” No, study after study states the obvious, children will follow most of their parents actions. Granted there will be exceptions, there always are, the human response system isn’t a machine and more complicated than that.
Because as we know people never, ever change.
Technically, once a person has reached past 20, it is a lot harder to change their personality and therefore their behavior. It is possible, but most drug users lack the fortitude and commitment to do so. Just because their exists cases of people who have doesn’t mean that everyone will. My second point is simply that you shouldn’t take the risk.
For a person to change, they would have to admit that what they are doing is wrong and should be changed. If you talk to someone with a drug habit, they are unlikely to admit that what they are doing is wrong. Neither are they going to admit that the way they are treating nor of taking care of their children is wrong.
I do lack compassion, yes, but neutering is a more safe suggestion than beating and killing of such uncaring parents. If I had suggested that, then what then?
I totally agree with the spay-neuter thing, the same should be done to all criminals committing serious crimes!!!!
I argree with you one hundred percent. My husband and I are currently going through pure hell over his 7 yr old daughter. His ex wife is a drunk, crackhead, and bipolar. She abuses my husbands daughter every chance she gets with the law turning their head and sweeping it under the rug. Nobody understands how horrible it is until they actually witness the abuse of a child their selves. I am going to take it one step further and say the spay/neuter thing is way to humane. They need to be tortured until they go insane and then they need to be dropped into a deep hole in the earth to starve to death. Actually I as a human being can’t think up anything horrible enough to do to them.
I am an incest surviver. i am 50 years old now and I am finally ready to let it go.My parents continue to be abusers,they will never change,I spent
years working at forgivness,but was made to carry rhe guilt and shame.i am not the abuser,nor am i the guilty one.It has been a total nightmare.
My baby sister commited suicide 4 years ago.She was only 39.I have a
lot of resentment towards my mother for she was told about it but failed
to protect her own children.I have little respect for either of them.It is now
time to move on.Ive suffered tremendously.
Jacob,
May I ask where you got your information from? I’m especiall interested in this statement:
"Technically, once a person has reached past 20, it is a lot harder to change their personality and therefore their behavior."
I’ve been trying to find information stating something along these lines but can’t fine any real evidence. Where did you find it?
Statements from professors and books on the mental development. I did not use resources online. It is also from what I’ve experience and read over the years. If you find scientific research that debunks what I’ve read, then I’ll be glad to read it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developmental_psychology – might be a good place to start, however it does not put into context all that I’m referring to.
If you review the stages of the mind, you’ll find that people generally halt most development of the brain around 20 and 21. Full maturity doesn’t occur until around 34 and 35.
From this basic and common assumption, it can be assumed that whatever one has decided once they have reached this level, it would be extremely difficult to change.
In order for that change to even begin to formulate, the person has to realize that what they are doing is wrong. I’ve known abusive people and this is the case. They fail to realize that their actions has adverse effects upon not only themselves whoever they are acting upon, “It is your fault I am hitting you.” No, no one can make you do anything except yourself.
Take also the example I’ve read in a magazine. The step father (or father) told the daughter that since her mother was not satisfying him, that she will have to do so. What idiocy is that? “It is not my fault I’m going to rape you, it is your mothers.”
What you are trying to change is not the intelligence, knowledge, but the personally and that is pretty much set. Well, it is given that people develop at different rates, but just try changing my personally. It won’t happen.
I actually totally agree with you which is why I was curious where you got your info from. I found some really interesting stats actually..things like there’s an 85% rate of people who return to abusive habits even after rehabilitation services. It’s serious stuff. I’m writing a paper arguing that people accused of child abuse should lose custody of children and lose the right to have any more children under their care.
Well, to be honest, I was kidding when I say those people should be “fixed.” I do agree that whatever children they do have should be taken from them at the point of the hospital. It would be impossible to have policy enacted that forces and enforces that the ability to have children is taken away.
It is a very difficult subject and I have video from when I spoke about it, but I would have to cut out all of the stuttering and clean up a lot of other bits.
I see many of your points. Of course you will ALWAYS have people that will say we lack compassion due to our views. In my mind, those are the types of people that enable these imbeciles to continue with their irrational lives and produce more drug addicted born babies.
I know a couple, who has taken in 2 children from the husbands sister.
This sister is a drug addict (crystal meth and I am sure whatever else she can get her hands on) and an alcoholic. She had a daughter, she was born addicted to Meth and alcohol. The baby was taken away from her and put into a home… the brother and his wife took the baby in and continue to care for her.
She had another baby in Texas that was stillborn because it was born addicted… to guess what!!!?? Meth and alcohol. She is now wanted in Texas, but she left the state immediately.
Now time rolls on.. she had another baby addicted to Meth and alcohol, baby was taken away, brother and wife debated on taking this second child in because they would like to have their own children rather than her drug/alcohol children.
Now she is in the Carolinas and basically called them on the phone sounding like she was bragging about how she was pregnant AGAIN. This is going to be another child born into this world addicted to Meth and Alcohol….
I think this is ridiculous. Can’t take her parts away because that would be against her civil rights. But she can go around and have all of these babies addicted to drugs and alcohol that may have issues due to this later in their lives?
I know the brother and wife aren’t going to continue to take these children in.
So.. when does it end? Why does she deserve civil rights when she doesn’t even care about the life she is creating and bringing into this world? Why should she be allowed to do this?
She NEEDS to be fixed. Nothing can be done because she continues to have babies in different states, so she gets away with this radical behaviour.
If she wants to drug and drink herself to death, fine by me. She has had multiple chances.
Why should these children have to suffer for her lack of care? And why should the people who "adopt" these children have to deal with the issues she caused later in their lives.
people can use drugs and be good parents. That idea that usage precludes qaulity nurturing is absurd
I agree to most of what you said. On the other hand I am a rehabilitated user. I have been clean for almost 10 years now and have seen personally the effects of my using. I have also seen the effects of the parent who decided that the drugs were way more important then their children. I have witnessed many a child taken from the parents and placed elsewhere, to find that the parent just has another child. It infuriates me. To think that another child can replace that of one lost. If the parental rights were taken away then so should the right of being able to reproduce.
Can you please let me know where I can get some statistics?
i used some of your statements for my research paper! nice job.