<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waiting for Next Generation CPU Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacobsantos.com/2008/computers/waiting-for-next-generation-cpu-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacobsantos.com/2008/computers/waiting-for-next-generation-cpu-architecture/</link>
	<description>Rumblings, rants, essays, stories by Jacob Santos about Web Site Development, Persistent Browser-Based Games, personal journal, and Programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3-aortic-dissection</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Santos</title>
		<link>http://jacobsantos.com/2008/computers/waiting-for-next-generation-cpu-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-33400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santosj.name/?p=668#comment-33400</guid>
		<description>From how it read on Wikipedia, it sounded like they were working on Fusion for over 2 years now and would be the next generation CPU. If that is the case and it is easy enough to find out in 6 months, then well it wouldn&#039;t matter anyway.

My next two machines are going to be a file server and a media server (bunch of TV Tuners and lots of hard drive space). Those two machines don&#039;t really need GPU core or Fusion. I will like to see the AM3 quad cores though. The current generation would suffice, but I won&#039;t have the money for a while.

I was unclear, I plan on upgrading my current machine that I use for development and mild game play. Who has time for playing games when you code 12 to 16 hours a day? Not me or at least not if I want to complete projects in a deadline. The CPU is kind of slow and could use 2.0+ CPU. Don&#039;t really need quad or dual cores, but hey couldn&#039;t hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From how it read on Wikipedia, it sounded like they were working on Fusion for over 2 years now and would be the next generation CPU. If that is the case and it is easy enough to find out in 6 months, then well it wouldn&#8217;t matter anyway.</p>
<p>My next two machines are going to be a file server and a media server (bunch of TV Tuners and lots of hard drive space). Those two machines don&#8217;t really need GPU core or Fusion. I will like to see the AM3 quad cores though. The current generation would suffice, but I won&#8217;t have the money for a while.</p>
<p>I was unclear, I plan on upgrading my current machine that I use for development and mild game play. Who has time for playing games when you code 12 to 16 hours a day? Not me or at least not if I want to complete projects in a deadline. The CPU is kind of slow and could use 2.0+ CPU. Don&#8217;t really need quad or dual cores, but hey couldn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdmadph</title>
		<link>http://jacobsantos.com/2008/computers/waiting-for-next-generation-cpu-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-33397</link>
		<dc:creator>mdmadph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santosj.name/?p=668#comment-33397</guid>
		<description>Unified GPU/CPU?  Are you talking about AMD&#039;s &quot;Fusion&quot; project?  You might be waiting a big longer than 6 months for that, and I don&#039;t think Intel is even trying for a unified GPU/CPU right now.  Not to mention that any unified solution is going to be slow -- &quot;cheap&quot; is what companies are shooting for in this situation, I&#039;d say.

But there&#039;s no need to wait -- if you&#039;re needing a new gaming PC, get someone you know (who knows hardware) to price you a good, affordable (but fast) one right now -- there&#039;s never a need to wait.  Something faster is _always_ right around the horizon, so there&#039;s really no need to wait. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unified GPU/CPU?  Are you talking about AMD&#8217;s &quot;Fusion&quot; project?  You might be waiting a big longer than 6 months for that, and I don&#8217;t think Intel is even trying for a unified GPU/CPU right now.  Not to mention that any unified solution is going to be slow &#8212; &quot;cheap&quot; is what companies are shooting for in this situation, I&#8217;d say.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s no need to wait &#8212; if you&#8217;re needing a new gaming PC, get someone you know (who knows hardware) to price you a good, affordable (but fast) one right now &#8212; there&#8217;s never a need to wait.  Something faster is _always_ right around the horizon, so there&#8217;s really no need to wait. <img src='http://jacobsantos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

